1-12: Verify integration with Remember Me functionality.

Since this middleware is part of the "Remember Me" feature implementation, ensure it properly handles extended session durations.

Let's check for session configuration and remember me implementation:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for session configuration
rg -A 5 "session\.(cookie|maxAge|expires)" --type js

# Look for remember me related code
rg -A 5 "rememberMe|remember_me" --type js

17-21: LGTM! Well-structured schema relationship.

The addition of the customer field with proper MongoDB/Mongoose relationship modeling looks good. The reference to the Customer model and required constraint ensures data integrity.

Let's verify the error handling in the controller:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the reservation controller properly handles customer validation

# Look for error handling in the controller
rg -A 5 "createReservation|updateReservation" backend/controller/

#!/bin/bash
# Let's get more context around the reservation controller implementation
rg -B 5 -A 15 "createReservation.*try" backend/controller/reservation.controller.js

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to get the controller implementation
cat backend/controller/reservation.controller.js

2-2: LGTM: Import statements are properly structured.

The new imports for fetchUserReservations and authenticateCustomer are correctly added and align with the route changes.

Also applies to: 4-4

7-8: Verify error handling for invalid user IDs.

The new routes using :id parameter need proper error handling for invalid user IDs.

Let's verify the error handling implementation:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the controller handles invalid user IDs
ast-grep --pattern 'fetchUserReservations = async (req, res) => {
  $$$
}'

# Check for error handling patterns in the controller
rg -A 5 "catch.*fetchUserReservations"

8-8: Verify error handling in the authentication middleware.

While adding authentication is a good security practice, we should ensure proper error handling in the middleware.

Let's check the error handling implementation:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify error handling in authCustomer middleware
# Expected: Should find try-catch blocks and error responses

# Check the middleware implementation
rg -A 10 "const authenticateCustomer" backend/middlewares/authCustomer.js

#!/bin/bash
# Let's get the complete middleware implementation to verify error handling
rg -A 20 "const authenticateCustomer" backend/middlewares/authCustomer.js

# Also check for any custom error handling utilities that might be used
rg "catch|error" backend/middlewares/authCustomer.js

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if there's proper error response in the catch block
# and check if the middleware is properly exported
rg -A 5 "catch \(err\)" backend/middlewares/authCustomer.js

# Also check if logger is properly imported
rg "require.*logger|import.*logger" backend/middlewares/authCustomer.js

24-31: Formatting changes look good, but verify if intentional.

The removal of trailing commas in the otp, otpExpiry, and isVerified fields maintains consistency with the rest of the schema.

#!/bin/bash
# Check if this is part of a larger formatting effort
rg -l ',$' --type js

Line range hint 1-63: Missing schema fields for "Remember Me" functionality.

The PR objective is to implement a "Remember Me" feature, but the schema lacks necessary fields to support this functionality. Consider adding:

• A field for refresh tokens
• Token expiration timestamp
• Last login timestamp

Here's a suggested addition to the schema:

 const customerSchema = new Schema(
   {
     // ... existing fields ...
+    refreshToken: {
+      type: String,
+      default: null
+    },
+    refreshTokenExpiry: {
+      type: Date,
+      default: null
+    },
+    lastLoginAt: {
+      type: Date,
+      default: null
+    },
     // ... rest of the schema ...
   },
   { timestamps: true }
 );

27-27: LGTM! Note about jwt-decode security.

The addition of [email protected] aligns with the "Remember Me" feature implementation. Note that this library is for client-side token payload reading only and doesn't handle token validation, which is the correct approach as token validation should be performed server-side.

27-27: Verify jwt-decode implementation.

Let's ensure the library is being used correctly in the codebase.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check jwt-decode usage patterns to ensure correct implementation

# Test 1: Look for jwt-decode imports
echo "Checking jwt-decode import patterns..."
rg "import.*jwt-decode" -A 5

# Test 2: Look for potential direct token validation attempts
# (should be handled server-side)
echo "Checking for token validation patterns..."
rg "verify.*token|validate.*token|isValid.*token"

# Test 3: Look for token decoding usage
echo "Checking token decoding patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'jwtDecode($token)'

#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual implementation in Dashboard.tsx
echo "Checking Dashboard.tsx implementation..."
cat frontend/src/components/Pages/Dashboard.tsx

# Look for any other files that might be using jwt-decode
echo -e "\nChecking for other jwt-decode usages..."
rg "jwtDecode" --type ts --type tsx

45-45: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add authentication guard for the dashboard route.

The dashboard route appears to handle user-specific data (reservations) but lacks authentication protection. This could expose sensitive information if accessed directly via URL.

Consider wrapping the route with an auth guard component:

-      <Route path="/dashboard" element={<Profile />} />
+      <Route
+        path="/dashboard"
+        element={
+          <ProtectedRoute>
+            <Profile />
+          </ProtectedRoute>
+        }
+      />

Let's verify if other protected routes use authentication guards:

17-17: CORS credentials configuration looks good but requires careful verification.

The addition of credentials: true is necessary for the "Remember Me" feature to work with cookies across origins. The implementation is correct and origins are properly restricted.

Let's verify the CORS configuration is consistent across the codebase:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other CORS configurations that might need credentials
# Test: Search for CORS configurations. Expect: All CORS configs to have credentials option set
rg -B 2 -A 2 "cors\(" 

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the corsOptions configuration to ensure it's properly defined
rg -B 5 -A 5 "corsOptions\s*=" 

Line range hint 7-7: Fix typo in error middleware import path.

The import statement contains a typo: errrorMiddleware (three 'r's) should be errorMiddleware.

Let's verify the correct middleware file name and its usage:

Apply this fix:

-const errorMiddleware = require("./middlewares/errrorMiddleware");
+const errorMiddleware = require("./middlewares/errorMiddleware");

1-5: LGTM! Imports and environment setup are well structured.

The necessary dependencies are properly imported and the environment variable usage follows best practices.

Also applies to: 11-11

1-112: Verify PR scope and objectives.

This file implements a dashboard/profile view for displaying user reservations, but it appears unrelated to the "Remember Me" checkbox functionality mentioned in the PR objectives. Please clarify if this file should be part of this PR or if it should be moved to a separate PR focused on user dashboard functionality.

25-35: ⚠️ Potential issue

Implement additional security measures

The login implementation needs several security enhancements:

1. Add CSRF protection
2. Implement rate limiting for failed attempts
3. Use more specific error messages without leaking sensitive information

 try {
   const response = await fetch(`${API_URL}/api/user/login`, {
     method: 'POST',
     headers: {
       'Content-Type': 'application/json',
+      'X-CSRF-Token': document.querySelector('meta[name="csrf-token"]').content,
     },
     body: JSON.stringify({ ...data, rememberMe }),
   });
   const result = await response.json();
-  if (!response.ok) throw new Error(result.message || 'Login failed');
+  if (!response.ok) {
+    switch (response.status) {
+      case 401:
+        throw new Error('Invalid email or password');
+      case 429:
+        throw new Error('Too many login attempts. Please try again later');
+      default:
+        throw new Error('An error occurred during login');
+    }
+  }

90-90: LGTM: Schema update for rememberMe is well-defined.

The optional boolean field is correctly added to the schema with proper type validation.

99-101: LGTM: Clean parameter extraction with proper validation.

The destructuring is performed after schema validation, ensuring type safety.

25-25: Verify the dashboard route implementation.

The new PROFILE menu item links to /dashboard. Please ensure that this route is properly configured in your routing setup and that the Dashboard component is implemented.

#!/bin/bash
# Search for dashboard route configuration
rg -l "path.*['\"]\/dashboard['\"]" --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx

# Search for Dashboard component
fd -e jsx -e tsx -e js -e ts "Dashboard"

#!/bin/bash
# Search for dashboard route configuration with corrected pattern
rg -l 'path.*["\'']/dashboard' --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx

# Check the route configuration in common routing files
rg -A 5 'Route.*dashboard' --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx

# Examine Dashboard component implementation
cat frontend/src/components/Pages/Dashboard.tsx

#!/bin/bash
# Search for route configurations with fixed pattern
rg -l "/dashboard" --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx

# Check App.tsx or similar files for routing
fd -e tsx -e jsx "App"

# Check if the Profile component is properly imported where routes are defined
rg -l "import.*Profile" --type js --type jsx --type ts --type tsx

#!/bin/bash
# Examine App.jsx content for route configuration
cat frontend/src/App.jsx

# Search for Dashboard/Profile imports and usage with text-based search
rg "Dashboard|Profile" --type-add 'web:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' -t web

17-18: LGTM: Required imports added correctly.

The new imports for navigation and cookie management are appropriately placed and necessary for the authentication feature.

36-36: LGTM: Navigation hook initialized correctly.

The useNavigate hook is properly initialized following React hooks best practices.

Line range hint 17-45: Verify integration with login page's "Remember Me" feature.

The current implementation checks for the authentication token but should be tested with the login page's "Remember Me" functionality to ensure proper integration.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration between Event.jsx and Login page

# Check if Login page implements Remember Me checkbox
echo "Checking for Remember Me implementation in Login page..."
rg -l "Remember Me" "frontend/src/components/Pages/Login"

# Check for consistent token handling
echo "Checking token handling consistency..."
rg "Cookies\.(get|set|remove)\('authToken'\)" "frontend/src/**/*.{jsx,js,tsx,ts}"

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct paths for Login and Event components
echo "Finding Login and Event component files..."
fd -e jsx -e js "Login|Event"

# Then check for Remember Me and cookie handling
echo "Checking for Remember Me implementation..."
rg -i "remember me" 

echo "Checking cookie handling across files..."
rg "Cookies\.(get|set|remove)\('authToken'\)"

20-21: Avoid revealing user existence to prevent enumeration attacks

Returning a 404 status with "User not found" may inadvertently disclose whether a user exists, potentially aiding in user enumeration attacks. It's more secure to return a generic authentication error.

[security_issue]

Consider responding with a generic authentication failure:

- return res.status(404).json({ message: "User not found" });
+ return res.status(401).json({ message: "Authentication failed" });

23-25: Prevent account verification status disclosure for enhanced security

Informing the client that the account is not verified can help attackers identify valid user accounts. To mitigate this risk, consider returning a generic error message instead.

[security_issue]

Modify the response to be less specific:

- return res.status(403).json({ message: "Account not verified" });
+ return res.status(401).json({ message: "Authentication failed" });

28-28: Verify that 'user.name' exists in the Customer model

Ensure that the Customer model includes a name property. If user.name is undefined, the log message will be incomplete or misleading.

Run the following script to check if name exists in the Customer model:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if 'name' property exists in the Customer model

# Find the Customer model file and search for 'name' property definition
fd 'customer.model.js' | while read file; do
  echo "Checking $file"
  rg 'name' "$file"
done

33-40: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure authorized users can only create reservations for themselves.

There's no check to verify that the authenticated user matches the userId in the request parameters. Without this check, a user could potentially create a reservation on behalf of another user.

Consider adding an authorization check:

 const userId = req.params.id

+ if (req.user.id !== userId) {
+   return res.status(403).json({
+     success: false,
+     message: "You are not authorized to create a reservation for this user.",
+   });
+ }

 const customer = await Customer.findById(userId);

91-129: ⚠️ Potential issue

Implement authorization check when fetching user reservations.

The fetchUserReservations function lacks an authorization mechanism to ensure the requesting user is permitted to access the specified user's reservations. This could lead to unauthorized access to other users' data.

Consider adding an authorization check:

 const userId = req.params.id; // Extract user ID from route parameters

+ if (req.user.id !== userId) {
+   return res.status(403).json({
+     success: false,
+     message: "You are not authorized to access these reservations.",
+   });
+ }

 const reservations = await Reservation.find({ customer: userId }).populate("customer", "name email");